WELCOME to VISUAL IRA !

Kurt Vonnegut Sums Up the Situation of Humans and Other Life on Earth. Use the Main Menu (below-right) for desired topics → ...

Showing posts with label General Relativity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label General Relativity. Show all posts

Sunday, April 24, 2016

Tips for VISUALIZING Science and Technology

I recently presented well-received a talk on "VISUALIZING Science and Technology" to a general audience at the Civil Discourse Club in The Villages, FL. I've also presented more technically deep material to the Science and Technology Club.

The key to UNDERSTANDING (at least for me) is the ability to "picture" the information, almost as if you had a physical model you could "touch and feel".

In my talk, I discussed several techniques, including animation, "blick" graphics, and others, and used them to illustrate:
  • Einstein's Relativity (based on his 2005 theories of "Special Relativity" and 2015 "General Relativity"), 
  • A "Nash Bargain" (if you saw the 2001 hit movie "A Beautiful Mind", you know that John Nash earned the 1994 Pulitzer prize in Economics in despite having paranoid schizophrenia), 
  • Bayesian "Inverse Probability" (based on the work of Rev. Thomas Bayes, published in 1763), and 
  • Global Warming (Real but not a big Deal).

EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY

How to UNDERSTAND the relativistic effects of Kinetic Energy (Special Relativity) and Gravitational Potential Energy (General Relativity)?

One of the relativistic effects is "Time Dilation". Clocks (of all kinds, including biological clocks) slow down when they are at high levels of either Kinetic or Gravitational Potential Energy.

Yes, I said it was CLOCKS that slow down (not TIME), and "Kinetic Energy" and (not "Speed"), and "Gravitational Potential Energy (not "Gravity") that cause these relativistic effects. Some readers may think it is TIME that slows down and that it is Relative Speed and Gravity/Acceleration that cause it, but I plan to motivate you otherwise!

Please refer to the above graphic

The image above is a screen capture from an animated "thought experiment" involving four identical, extraordinarily accurate clocks and an idealized Earth that has a conveniently-located, friction-free Tunnel, cut through the Center, from the left Surface to the right Surface.

Initially, all clocks are "at rest". The RED and BLUE clocks are at the left edge of the image, very far from the gravitational attraction of the Earth. The GREEN clock is fixed in position at the Earth Surface, and the GREY clock is fixed at the Center.

OK, let us set the BLUE and RED clocks to zero. Keep the BLUE clock fixed in place and release the RED clock.

Release the RED clock

The RED clock slowly "falls" towards the Earth, accelerating as it gets closer. As the RED clock enters the left end of the Tunnel and passes the GREEN clock at the Surface, each clock makes a record of its reading and that of the other. As the RED clock passes the GREY clock at the Center, they each record both readings. The RED clock continues out the right end of the tunnel, decelerates as it gets further from the Earth, momentarily stops moving very far from the Earth, and then "falls" back to the Earth.

Compare Intervals recorded by each clock

As the RED clock it passes the GREY and GREEN clocks, and as it stops momentarily next to the BLUE clock they exchange readings and figure out the interval between their first encounter and this one. According to Einstein, the RED clock will measure a shorter interval than the GREY clock, the GREEN clock, and the BLUE clock.

This difference may be expressed as picoseconds per second (picosec/sec), that is how many trillionths of a second less the interval indicated on the RED clock, divided by the time interval, is less than the interval measured by the other clocks.

Using the BLUE clock as a reference, the table in the image above indicates that the GREEN clock, at the Earth Surface, will measure a Time Dilation" of 696 picosec/sec, and the GREY clock, at the Surface, will measure 1044 picosec/sec. (These values agree with data found on Wikipedia and other sources.)

So, is it Gravity or Gravitational Potential Energy that causes Time Dilation?

As the graph above shows, Gravity is about zero at the far left, when the RED and BLUE clocks are far from the gravitational attraction of the Earth. Gravity increases to a maximum (negative) value of 32 feet per second squared (32 ft/s2) at the Surface, and then DECREASES to zero at the Center. Gravity is considered negative because it points to the center of the Earth.

Gravitational Potential Energy (also considered negative) is about zero at the far left, continually increases in (negative) magnitude as the RED clock passes the Surface, and continues to increase in magnitude, reaching a maximum (negative) magnitude at the Center (unlike Gravity which decreases in magnitude to zero at the Center).

In mathematical terms, Gravitational Potential Energy increases "monotonically" from the far left to the Center, while Gravity increases and then decreases, so it is "non-monotonic" between these points.

Well, Time Dilation is about zero at the far left, and MONOTONICALLY increases in magnitude from the far left to the Center. Therefore, Time Dilation is more like Gravitational Potential Energy than it is like Gravity. So, it is not Gravity, per se, that causes Time Dilation but it is Gravitational Potential Energy.

The graph indicates that the speed of the RED clock is about zero at the start, increases to 25,000 mph at the Surface, and then to 31,000 mph at the Center. (These values agree with data found on Wikipedia and other sources.)

Kinetic Energy increases and decreases more like Time Dilation than does Speed. (Kinetic Energy varies as the square of the Speed as does Time Dilation). So, it is not Speed, per se, that causes Time Dilation but it is Kinetic Energy.

(NOTE: This topic is not complete, I intend to add more material)

Ira Glickstein

Wednesday, April 20, 2016

WELCOME to VISUAL IRA !

Kurt Vonnegut Sums Up the Situation of Humans and Other Life on Earth. Use the Main Menu (below-right) for desired topics

The Atmospheric "Greenhouse" Effect is Real, and the Earth is Warming. How Much Global Warming is due to Human Activities?
Einstein's Special Relativity (1905) and General Relativity (1915) Revolutionized Physics Forever
CLIMATE SCIENCE TOPICS RELATIVITY TOPICS
[Click desired Topic] [Click desired Topic]
INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION
PHYSICAL ANALOGY ENERGY
ATMOSPHERIC WINDOWS INSIGHT
EMISSION SPECTRA TWIN PARADOX
MOLECULES AND PHOTONS EXCEL SPREADSHEET MODEL
LIGHT AND HEAT
REAL NOT BIG DEAL TIME AND RELATIVITY

Practical "Artificial Intelligence Advisers" YOU Can Use - Computer-Aided Decision Making
Hierarchy Theory - "The Magical Number Seven (plus or minus two) - Optimal Span
AI ADVISER TOPICS HIERARCHY TOPICS
[Click desired Topic] [Click desired Topic]
INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION
BAYESIAN INFERENCE tbs
NASH BARGAIN ADVISOR tbs
tbs tbs
tbs tbs
tbs
tbs tbs

MORE OF MY STUFF YOU MIGHT FIND INTERESTING

Thursday, September 3, 2015

What is TIME? (In the context of Relativity)


Time - the fourth dimension (2013 Flame Challenge) from Ira Glickstein on Vimeo.

My entry for Alan Alda's 2013 Flame Challenge was submitted way back in February 2011. It is in the form of a short video  answering the deceptively simple question "What is Time?" (click above to view the video).

Alan Alda is on a mission to help youngsters become interested in science. In conjuction with the Center for Communicating Science at SUNY Stony Brook, he started the Flame Challenge in 2012 with the question "What is Flame?" They received some 800 entries.

I expect they will get even more this year with the question "What is Time?"

ABOUT MY ENTRY

I think I've come up with a unique way of viewing "Time - the fourth dimension".  Due to a strict limit on the length of the video, and the fact that it is aimed at 11-year old students, I have had to greatly simplify the material. This Blog posting includes additional material that will be useful to adult readers and science teachers who wish to know more about my way of viewing Time.

There are three big ideas here:
  1. TIME is NOT a clock (any more than Space is a ruler or Heat is a thermometer), nor is it rotation of the Earth or motion or the order of events, etc.  
  2. TIME is the fourth dimension, plain and simple. It appears different to us because the whole Universe is speeding along the Time axis at the speed of light.  
  3. TIME slows down when we move in Space because nothing can move faster than the speed of light, so any motion in Space must take away from the speed in Time such that the vector sum of the Space and Time velocities exactly equals the speed of light.
WHAT TIME IS NOT

Time is not the tick, tick, tock of a click, click, clock, any more than Space is a ruler or Heat is  a thermometer!
Nor is Time the rotation of the Earth on its axis that gives us day and night divided into 24 hours. Nor is it the movement of the tilted Earth in orbit around the Sun that gives us the seasons, nor any other kind of motion. Nor is it the spontaneous decay of certain atoms that give radioactive materials a half-life. Nor is it simply the ordering of events.

WHAT TIME IS

Time, plain and simple, is the fourth dimension, very much like the first three dimensions of Space.
The Time dimension appears different to us because you and I and the whole Universe are hurtling along it at very nearly the speed of light as a consequence of the “Big Bang” expansion some 13.7 billion years ago, in which our Universe, along with the dimensions of Space and Time, originated.

Since Time itself originated with the "Big Bang" it may not be meaningful to even ask the question "What happened before the Big Bang?" In any case, we may never know what caused it.
The Universe originated as an incredibly energetic and dense point of Energy/Matter that suddenly expanded. During the initial moments of the expansion, it is not clear if there was anything like the sub-atomic and atomic particles of Matter or the radiation of Energy with which we are familiar today. However, when Matter and Energy, as we know it, formed, all particles with mass were expelled along the Time axis, or at very tiny angles with respect to that axis. You and I, along with everyone and everything else, are still moving along or near that dimension at very close to the speed of light, c, which is as fast as anything can go.
We do not notice our ultra-rapid travel along the Time dimension as motion because the whole Universe is moving along with us. Therefore, we notice only relative motion between ourselves and other people and between ourselves and other things.
For example, people on the equator are happily unaware that they are moving Eastward at about 1,000 miles per hour due to the rotation of the Earth on its axis. Unless you live in one of the polar regions, you are moving Eastward at hundreds of miles per hour. Even if you are on an airplane, travelling  "Westward" from New York to Chicago or Los Angeles at 500 miles per hour, your net velocity is Eastward, due to the rotation of the Earth! We are equally unaware that the whole Earth is speeding along at over 67,000 miles per hour on its orbit around the Sun!
WHY TIME CAN BE SLOWED A BIT
We live in four-dimensional SpaceTime where everything must move at the speed of light, c, either along the Time axis, along a Space axis, or in a combination of Time and Space at an angle, Θ, to the Time axis. If movement is totally aligned with the Time axis, Θ = 0 and we are said to be “at rest” in Space, and we move along the Time axis at the normal rate (c, about one foot per nanosecond).
If we are not "at rest" in Space, Θ > 0, and we move through SpaceTime in a combination of Space and Time such that the vector sum of our Space and Time velocities is exactly c. Since nothing can go faster than c, any movement in Space must slow down our movement in Time. This was recognized over 100 years ago by Lorentz, Minkowski, and Einstein, who use the terms "Dilation of Time" and "Contraction of Space". This is usually expressed in terms of the Lorentz factor:



 \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} \,
where c is the velocity of light and v is the velocity of an object in Space.
As an engineer, I found that way of expressing relativistic effects of travel at significant fractions of the speed of light not to be "understandable" from my physical (and perhaps anal) point of view.

After knocking my head against the wall over an inordinate amount of Time, I finally realized that I could get an exactly equivalent Lorentz factor by considering the angle Θ, between the Time axis and the velocity vector of an object through SpaceTime.

[above image modified 12 April 2013]

It turns out that v (the velocity of the object in Space) divided by c is equal to the Sin Θ, and that 1/ϒ, the Lorenz factor, is equal to the Cos Θ.  

WHAT ARE DIMENSIONS?
This may sound like a simple question, and the answer is pretty simple, but, just to be sure we are all on the same page (see figure below):
0 - A POINT has ZERO dimensions
1 - Drag the point along the FIRST dimension ("x" of Space) and you get a LINE, that has ONE dimension.
2 - Drag the line along the SECOND dimension ("y" of Space) and you get a SQUARE (or rectangle) that has TWO dimensions.
3 - Drag the square along the THIRD dimenson ("z" of Space) and you get a CUBE (or rectangular solid) that has THREE dimensions.
4 - Drag the cube along the FOURTH dimension ("t" of Time) and you get a HYPER-CUBE (or hyper-rectangular solid) that has FOUR dimensions.


SUMMARY

When movement is a combination of Time and Space, and the velocity in Space is v, an object is moving through SpaceTime at an angle Θ, such that: v/c = SinΘ, and 1/ϒ (the Lorentz factor) = Cos Θ.

The figure below shows the situation for seven different values for the angle of travel through SpaceTime, from Θ = 0 to Θ = 90 .


Θ = 0⁰  [Sin Θ = 0.0000,  Cos Θ = 1.0000]   AT REST IN SPACE
For an object that is "at rest" in Space, Θ = 0. Even when an object is not moving along the Space axis, it is moving along the Time axis. Since everything in SpaceTime must have a speed of c, an object "at rest" in Space must be moving at speed c in Time. Note that for this condition, v/c = 0 and the Lorentz factor ϒ = 1. Note also that, for this case Sin Θ is equal to v/c and Cos Θ is equal to 1/ϒ.

Even the fastest rockets and satellites developed so far go only a tiny, tiny fraction of c. Therefore, for all practical purposes, the angle, Θ, is 0 (approximately equal to ZERO degrees). For example, the Earth is travelling around the Sun at a speed of 67,000 miles per hour, faster than any rocket, but that is only 0.001 % of the speed of light. At 67,000 miles per hour, v/c =  0.00001 and  Θ = 0.0000017⁰.

Θ = 15⁰ [Sin Θ = 0.2588, Cos Θ = 0.9659]    MOVING 26% OF c IN SPACE
An object is moving through SpaceTime at an angle of Θ = 15. It moves through Space at 26% of c and through Time at 97% of c. Note that for this condition, v/c = 0.2588 and the Lorentz factor ϒ = 0.9659. Note also that, for this case Sin Θ is equal to v/c and Cos Θ is equal to 1/ϒ.

Θ = 30⁰ [Sin Θ = 0.5000, Cos Θ = 0.8660]   MOVING 50% OF c IN SPACE
An object is moving through SpaceTime at an angle of Θ = 30. It moves through Space at 50% of c and through Time at 87% of c. Note that for this condition, v/c = 0.5000 and the Lorentz factor ϒ = 0.8660. Note also that, for this case Sin Θ is equal to v/c and Cos Θ is equal to 1/ϒ.

Θ = 45⁰ [Sin Θ = 0.7071, Cos Θ = 0.7071] MOVING 71% OF c IN SPACE
An object is moving through SpaceTime at an angle of Θ =45. It moves through Space at 71% of c and through Time at 71% of c. Note that for this condition, v/c = 0.7071 and the Lorentz factor ϒ = 0.7071. Note also that, for this case Sin Θ is equal to v/c and Cos Θ is equal to 1/ϒ.

Θ = 60⁰ [Sin Θ = 0.8660, Cos Θ = 0.5000] MOVING 87% OF c IN SPACE
An object is moving through SpaceTime at an angle of Θ = 60. It moves through Space at 87% of c and through Time at 50% of c. Note that for this condition, v/c = 0.8660 and the Lorentz factor ϒ = 0.5000. Note also that, for this case Sin Θ is equal to v/c and Cos Θ is equal to 1/ϒ.

Θ = 75⁰ [Sin Θ = 0.9659, Cos Θ = 0.2558]   MOVING 97% OF c IN SPACE
An object is moving through SpaceTime at an angle of Θ = 75. It moves through Space at 97% of c and through Time at 26% of c. Note that for this condition, v/c = 0.9659 and the Lorentz factor ϒ = 0.2558. Note also that, for this case Sin Θ is equal to v/c and Cos Θ is equal to 1/ϒ.

Θ = 90⁰ [Sin Θ = 1.0000, Cos Θ = 0.0000]      TIME STANDS STILL 
Light (and other forms of electro-magnetic radiation) move through SpaceTime at an angle of Θ = 90. Light moves through Space at 100% of c and, therefore, since nothing can go faster than cTime stands still. Note that for this condition, v/c = 1.0000 and the Lorentz factor ϒ = 0.0000. Note also that, for this case Sin Θ is equal to v/c and Cos Θ is equal to 1/ϒ. Anything with mass cannot achieve this speed in Space because it would take an infinite amount of energy to get it up to this speed in Space.
 
[ADDED 11 March 2013] In response to some skepticism about my contention that the whole known Universe is speeding along the Time dimension at nearly the speed of light, I did more research and found support from Brian Greene, Professor of Physics and Mathematics at Columbia U, who has been featured on the PBS Nova series. He writes:

“Special relativity declares a similar law for all motion: the combined speed of any object’s motion through space and its motion through time is always precisely equal to the speed of light” [Excerpt From: Greene, Brian. “The Fabric of the Cosmos.” Vintage Books, 2007. See http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/fabric-of-cosmos.htm for his PBS series.]


Ira Glickstein

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

VISUALIZING - Using My FREE Excel Spreadsheet for Special and General Relativity


Nowadays it is common to use computer models to help us VISUALIZE and better understand complex situations and systems. Prior to the advent of computer models, we had to use mental models in our "mind's eye", along with physical aids such as paper maps and diagrams, modelling clay, and so on. I've created an interactive Excel Spreadsheet for Special and General Relativity.



User selects a Star, Planet, or Set Angle Option. 

Right side shows Special Relativity Effects due to the Kinetic Energy of moving at half the speed of light in empty Space. 

Left side shows equivalent General Relativity Effects, where Time "curves" due to the Potential Energy of being "at rest" close to a Black Hole.



Albert Einstein was a great physicist, with all the requisite mathematical tools. However, he rejected purely mathematical abstraction and resorted to physical analogy for his most basic insights. For example, as part of the thought process that resulted in his theories of Special Relativity (1905) and General Relativity (1915) he imagined himself riding along a beam of light; or as an observer standing along the tracks as a train zipped by at near-light-speed; or as a scientist sealed in a closed box and not able to tell if the box was stationary on the surface of the Earth, subject to gravity, or in deep space, far from massive objects, but subject to acceleration due to being dragged by a rocket at ever-increasing speeds.

Of course, Einstein and virtually all scientists and technologists use mathematical abstractions to quantify the meaning in our visualization models. We change the initial conditions and run these models to simulate what may or may not happen in different situations.

COMPUTER MODELS FOR VISUALIZATION

As personal computers and the Internet have become endemic, manual typewriters, paper maps, physical books, and so much else has been displaced by automated versions. Similarly, computer visualizations and models have displaced older methods - except for that old reliable "mind's eye" which remains as important as ever.

During my career as a Senior System Engineer at IBM and Lockheed-Martin I made extensive use of computer models and visualizations and have continued to do so since retirement.

VISUALIZING EINSTEIN'S SPECIAL AND GENERAL RELATIVITY

Perhaps the most well-known equation in the world is E = mc2, recognized by virtually every person. But, what does it really mean?

And, many people know about the so-called "twin paradox", where one twin goes off on long mission at high speeds into space, and comes back younger. But why does this happen and exactly what causes it?

If "everything is relative" why isn't the stay-at-home twin also also younger? So, everything is not relative, and perhaps Einstein's original name for his theories "Invariance" is more apt -for the fact all observers, including those moving at different speeds, measure the same speed for light.

If the traveling twin is younger due to experiencing high speed and acceleration, then it is aging that has slowed down, not time, per se.

Furthermore, what, precisely, is TIME? And how is TIME united with SPACE to form SpaceTime?

When you Google any of this stuff you are quickly buried in equations and tensor mathematics that no one (even an engineer like me) can really understand!

Well, all this bothered me for most of my life until, back in 2012, I decided to answer Alan Alda's Flame Challenge "What is Time?" and produce a short video. In the research process for that project, I think I had a critical insight into TIME, SPACE, and RELATIVITY that may help you VISUALIZE this important scientific theory.

Time - the fourth dimension (2013 Flame Challenge) from Ira V Glickstein on Vimeo.

Since that time, I've continued to delve into Relativity and I've come up with what I think is a unique way to visualize and ... perhaps ... even understand it. The following images are screenshots from an Excel spreadsheet I created to provide myself (and you :^) a "hands-on" experience with the relativistic effects of high speed (kinetic energy) and high acceleration (potential energy), including time dilation, length contraction, and the curvature of SPACE and TIME. It is available free.


Free Excel Spreadsheet for VISUALIZATION of Einstein's Special and General Relativity. 

Image is of the Main Panel where user selects a Star, Planet, or Set Angle Option. In the case illustrated, the SpaceTime angle is set to 30º, where velocity is half the speed of light. This causes clocks to slow down by 13.4%, which corresponds to 49 days per year or 482 seconds per hour. Right side shows Special Relativity Effects due to the Kinetic Energy of moving at half the speed of light in empty Space. Left side shows equivalent General Relativity Effects, where Time "curves" due to the Potential Energy of being "at rest" close to a Black Hole.


Free Excel Spreadsheet for VISUALIZATION of Einstein's Special and General Relativity. 

Image is of the SpaceTime view of the right side of the Main Panel (where the vector sum of TRAVEL + AGING = 1) plus the Minkowski-Like SpaceTime view (where the simple sum of TRAVEL + AGING =1).  

Free Excel Spreadsheet for VISUALIZATION of Einstein's Special and General Relativity. 
Image is of the Minkowski-Like view (described above) compared to a Planck view, where both Space and Time are assumed to be discrete, and Each tiny cell is 1 Planck Time (tby 1 Planck Length (P).

THE MAP IS NOT THE TERRITORY!

As my principal PhD advisor, Howard Pattee, taught me, "The MAP is NOT the TERRITORY". That sage statement means that no model is exactly the same as the thing being modeled (else it would be the real thing.)

We make models because the real thing is too complex and difficult for us to visualize, or -like the Global Climate- is not readily available for us to experiment upon.


The MAP is NOT the TERRITORY !
Many a General (or football coach) has moved symbols around on a map of the field of battle, convincing himself and his staff of inevitable victory, only to find his opponent also had a model, perhaps a better one plus superior forces to carry it to victory. 

We generally model only the most important or critical parts of the situation or complex system we are trying to visualize. We consider the model to have been successful if the results match actuality to some level of fidelity, at least for those significant portions. If subsequent testing reveals that the model does not comport with reality, we must improve or discard it.

Ira Glickstein

Saturday, August 29, 2015

Relative ENERGY (Kinetic and Gravitational Potential Energy) Determines Relativistic Effects

LEFT: Jumpy Jill is in a friction-free tunnel and cycles forever. She is "at rest" at the top and bottom of the hole and therefore has zero Kinetic Energy (KE). She does have positive Gravitational Potential Energy (GPE) with respect to the center of the tunnel. Her maximum speed is achieved at the center. 

RIGHTFar-Out Fred is launched into space at a hair less than Escape Velocity. He travels a very long distance over nearly infinite time before he runs out of KE and is momentarily "at rest". He falls back towards the planet, enters the friction-free hole at a hair less than Escape Velocity, reaches maximum speed at center, decelerates, exits hole at a hair less than Escape Velocity, heads into space, and cycles forever. 

Note: All speeds and relative energy are with respect to an observer "at rest" at the very center of the planet.

Relativistic Effects are Proportional to Kinetic Energy and Gravitational Potential Energy

Does relative TOTAL ENERGY determine the magnitude of Time Dilation and Length Contraction? Here are some equations, arguments and examples that support the idea that these Relativistic Effects are due to Total Energy with respect to a reference observer. I will appreciate comments and corrections.

Time Dilation is a relativistic effect that slows the rate of a clock that is moving and/or accelerating with respect to an “at rest” reference clock. 

"Coordinate" Time Interval between two events, Δt, ("delta tee") measured by a clock "at rest" in a reference frame (zero speed, zero gravity). 

"Proper" Time Interval between the same two events, Δτ("delta tau") measured by a clock that is moving and/or accelerating with respect to the reference frame (due to relative gravity and/or speed).

Δτ is equal to or greater than Δt due to Time Dilation. 

Lorentz Factorγ = Δt/Δτequal to or greater than 1.0. (γ  is lower-case "gamma")

Lorentz Factor due to relative speedγK = 1/SQRT(1-v2/c2where v is the relative velocity between the "at rest" clock and the moving clock, and c is the speed of light in a vacuum. 

Lorentz Factor due to relative gravityγG = 1/SQRT(1-2GM/rc2), where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the spherical planet (or massive object) that is the source of the gravitational field, and r (which must be equal to or greater than the radius of the planet) is the distance of the clock from the center of the planet.

Time Dilation,TD = Δt - Δτ, is the "coordinate" time interval minus the "proper" time interval. 

Time Dilation,TD = (γ - 1)Δτ, an equivalent way to express Time Dilation. Please note that the (γ - 1) factor is common to the equation for Time Dilation as well as the expressions for KE and GPE.

Kinetic Energy of the clock, KE = (γK  – 1)m0c2, where m0 is the "rest mass" of the clock.

Gravitational Potential Energy of the clock with respect to infinity, -GPE = (γG  – 1)m0c2 .

Escape Velocity, vE, from a non-rotating, no atmosphere planet, P, is the speed, perpendicular to the surface, where KE is exactly equal to -GPE. (The minus sign is due to GPE being defined as zero at infinite distance from P, increasing in magnitude to its largest NEGATIVE value at the center, and then increasing asymptotically to zero an infinite distance from P.) A rocket launched at vE will just break free of the gravity of P and continue into space forever, with no need for further propulsion.  vE = SQRT(2GM/r), where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of P, and r (which must be equal to or greater than the radius of P) is the distance of the object from the center of P.

A clock moving at vE (the Escape velocity associated with the surface of P), but far from any massive object (zero gravity), will have exactly the same TD as a clock “at rest” (zero speed) on the surface of P. Note that this occurs when the KE of the former is exactly equal to the -GPE with respect to infinity of the latter.

As an Engineer (not a Physicist) these facts scream out that relative ENERGY (KINETIC and/or -GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL) causes TD. I find it surprising that these facts are not mentioned at all in the Wikipedia entries for Escape_velocity nor Time_dilation, nor by most internet resources for relativistic effects. In the few instances where mentioned, the exact relationship of ENERGY to RELATIVISTIC EFFECTS is treated as an unimportant coincidence. It seems to me that RELATIVE ENERGY IS THE PRIME CAUSATIVE FACTOR FOR RELATIVISTIC EFFECTS, as confirmed by simple examination of the applicable equations.

Summary

A change in kinetic energy causes a linear change in TD.  A change in speed will cause a change in TD, but not in a way that is linearly related to the Lorentz factor. For example, a 1% increase in speed, from 0.098c to 0.099c will cause a 0.01% increase in TD, while a 1% increase from 0.98c to 0.99c will cause a  41% increase!

A change in GPE causes a linear change in Time dilation. A change in gravity will cause a change in TD, but not in a way that is linearly related to the Lorentz factor. (Indeed, the relationship between gravity and Time dilation is not even monotonic! When a clock is within a massive object, gravity decreases while Time dilation increases! [Thanks to John Rennie at the physics stack exchange for kindly (and with extraordinary patience) corrected my misconceptions about gravitational potential energy, see here.]


The equations for TDE, and -EG. share a common element: (γ - 1)
TD =  (γ  –  1)Δτ.
 EK = (γK  – 1)m0c2 
-EG = (γG  – 1)m0c2

When EK -E then (γK  – 1)  (γG  – 1) (γ –  1) 

Therefore, for a clock with unit mass (1 kg), the time dilation per second of "proper" time, is (γK  – 1)/m0c2, due to relative speed, and (γG  – 1)/m0c2, due to relative gravity.

It should be "obvious" that TD experienced by a clock "at rest" on the surface of P is exactly equal to the TD experienced by a clock in deep space moving at the Escape velocity, vE, associated with the surface of P.


LINEAR and MONOTONIC Relationship between ENERGY and Relativistic Effects

The Excel graphs below compare ENERGY, Velocity, and Gravity with the Time Dilation.

The analysis is based on the Kinetic Energy resulting from relative velocities from zero to 295,599,350 meters per second (0 to 98.6% of c, the speed of light) in deep space -or- the Gravitational Potential Energy resulting from being "at rest" within the gravitational attraction of either an Earth-like massive sphere or a compact Neutron Star-like massive sphere (with a mass of two Suns and a radius of only 13 km, experienced from an infinite distance down to the center.


Time Dilation is LINEAR with Respect to Kinetic Energy and NON-Linear with Respect to Velocity


The above graphic shows the relationship between Time Dilation, Velocity, and Kinetic Energy. Note that, for all speeds from zero to the speed of light, TD is exactly proportional to KE, and TD is not proportional to Velocity.

Time Dilation is LINEAR with Respect to Gravitational Potential Energy and NON-Linear and NON-Monotonic with Respect to Gravity (Example for Earth-Like Spherical Massive Object)
The above graphic shows the relationship between Time Dilation, Gravity, and Gravitational Potential Energy. Note that, for this example, using a spherical mass with the same mass and radius of the Earth, TD is exactly proportional to GPE. Note also that the relationship between TD and Gravity is not even monotonic!
From Infinity to the Surface, as Gravity INCREASES in (negative) magnitude, TD increases, but non-linearly.
From the Surface to the Center, as Gravity DECREASES in (negative) magnitude, TD increases, also non-linearly.

Time Dilation is LINEAR with Respect to Gravitational Potential Energy and NON-Linear and NON-Monotonic with Respect to Gravity (Example for Neutron Star-Like Spherical Massive Object)
The above graphic shows the relationship between Time DilationGravity, and Gravitational Potential Energy. Note that, for this example, using a spherical mass with the same mass and radius of a Neutron Star, which is much, much more massive than the Earth, and very much smaller, so its density is far greater than the Earth, TD is exactly proportional to GPE. Note also that the relationship between TD and Gravity is not even monotonic!
From Infinity to the Surface, as Gravity INCREASES in (negative) magnitude, TD increases, but non-linearly.
From the Surface to the Center, as Gravity DECREASES in (negative) magnitude, TD increases, also non-linearly.

Conclusion
TOTAL ENERGY with respect to the center of P determines the magnitude of Time Dilation and Length Contraction for the entire journeys of both Fred and Jill. These journeys involve movement at various speeds, including momentary instants of being “at rest”, and various levels of gravitational attraction, including momentary instants of zero gravity.


The equations for TDE, and -EG. share a common element: (γ - 1)
TD =  (γ  –  1)Δτ. where γ = Δt/Δτ,
 EK = (γK  – 1)m0c2, where   γK = 1/SQRT(1-v2/c2)  
-EG = (γG  – 1)m0c2, where   γG = 1/SQRT(1-2GM/rc2)
When EK -E then (γK  – 1)  (γG  – 1) (γ –  1) 

Therefore, for a clock with unit mass (1 kg), the time dilation per second of "proper" time, is (γK  – 1)/m0c2, due to relative speed, and (γG  – 1)/m0c2, due to relative gravity.

When EK -E then (γK  – 1)  (γG  – 1) (γ  –  1) 

My Excel analysis confirms, for a wide range of relative velocities and gravitational situations, ENERGY remains linearly related to Time Dilation and Length Contraction This is definitely NOT the case for Velocity nor Gravity, each of which are asymptotically limited.

Therefore it is reasonable to conclude that relative TOTAL ENERGY determines the Relativistic Effects of any combination of speed and gravity.

[Edited 24 July 2021. I fixed a couple of typos and changed "ϒ" to "γ".]

Ira Glickstein